The Bangladesh government has begun
preparations to clarify the legal procedures concerning the property of former
Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. Public prosecutors at the International Crimes
Tribunal say that the rules will clearly define the procedures for confiscating
the properties of convicted individuals, auctioning or selling them, and using
the proceeds to compensate victims and the families of those killed. This could
pave the way for action against properties registered in Sheikh Hasina’s name. However,
it would be premature to say that Sheikh Hasina’s ancestral home will be
directly sold. The course of action will depend on factors such as whose name
the property is registered under, who its actual owner is, and against whom the
court’s order is enforceable.
According to a report, Chief Public
Prosecutor Mohammad Amin Islam told reporters on Monday, September 7, that the
International Crimes Tribunal Act and existing regulations provide for the
confiscation of property, the imposition of fines, and compensation for
victims. However, they do not clearly specify which government mechanism should
be used to auction or sell confiscated property. According to public
prosecutors, once the regulations are amended, the government’s administrative
branch will be able to take action under a clear legal framework to implement
court orders. Officials have also indicated that the proposed amendments could
be applied to judgments that have already been issued, meaning the changes
could also affect previous rulings.
It is worth noting that in the mass
killing case, the tribunal sentenced Sheikh Hasina and several others to death
and ordered the confiscation of their properties. This has raised questions
about which of the properties they declared can be directly confiscated. According to the affidavit submitted
for the 12th National Parliamentary Election in 2024, Sheikh Hasina had movable
and immovable assets worth approximately 434 million taka in her name. These
included bank deposits, a vehicle, gold jewelry, furniture, and land.
Dhanmondi House No. 32, widely known
as Sheikh Hasina’s ancestral home, is the most significant property in this
case. The house is reportedly not Sheikh Hasina’s personal property but is
registered in the name of the Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Memorial Trust. For this
reason, it may not be easy to confiscate the property by treating it as Sheikh
Hasina’s personal asset.
According to legal experts, property
belonging to a trust cannot be confiscated in the same way as an individual’s
personal property unless there is a separate legal basis or a court order.
Similarly, Dhanmondi’s “Sudha Sadan” is reportedly registered in the names of
Sheikh Hasina’s children, Sajeeb Wazed and Saima Wazed. The Garden House in
Gazipur was also inherited by Sheikh Hasina, Sheikh Rehana, and their children. Therefore, separate verification of
ownership and legal status will be necessary before any action can be taken
against these properties.